HomeResearch and NewsRussian Billionaires Affected by Sanctions

Russian Billionaires Affected by Sanctions

Russia’s mining billionaires are starting to feel the sting of economic sanctions.

Mikhail Prokhorov, whose investment empire stretches from the world’s largest aluminum maker to the Brooklyn Nets basketball team, recently explored whether fellow oligarchs, including Vladimir Potanin, were willing to buy a portion of his $2.7 billion stake in potash miner OAO Uralkali, two people familiar with the matter said. The reason: the sinking value of his Russian holdings means he’d like less debt and more cash, they said.

While Prokhorov aborted the plan after failing to get the price he wanted, it’s the latest example of the pressure on Russia’s commodity magnates as sanctions hit the economy at home and a global slowdown undercuts metals demand. Billionaires including Alexey Mordashov, who controls steelmaker OAO Severstal (SVST), and Potanin, the biggest shareholder in OAO Norilsk Nickel, have increased dividends from their businesses after selling some assets.

“Whenever you hear billionaires say they are not affected by sanctions and the general situation in Russia, that’s not quite true,” said Yulia Bushueva, who helps to manage about $500 million at Arbat Capital in Moscow. “It’s natural that they are looking at options to cut the debt. Others just want to get some extra cash in the current situation.”

Economy Slows

The prospect of a slowing Chinese economy, where decades of double-digit economic growth has driven commodities demand, is another reason they’re feeling cautious, she said.

The Russian economy is teetering on the brink of recession as sanctions over the Ukraine crisis spur capital outflows and a domestic dollar shortage.

The net worth of Russia’s seven richest mining and metals magnates has dropped to $80.8 billion from $94.2 billion at the start of the year, Bloomberg Billionaires Index data show.

Uralkali’s market value declined about 56 percent since November last year, when Prokhorov’s companies agreed to buy about 28 percent in the potash maker, using debt. The company’s shares rose 2.6 percent to 141.1 rubles at 3:12 p.m. in Moscow.

Prokhorov’s Onexim Group and press representatives for Severstal and Potanin’s holding company Interros declined to comment.

Uralkali, which produces the fertilizer potash from mines in Russia, said on Oct. 23 it will pay about 8 billion rubles ($190 million) in dividends -- more than in 2013 even though net income fell.

Cutting Debt

Mordashov’s Severstal said this month it will pay $1.13 billion in interim dividends after it sold U.S. assets for $2.33 billion. Mordashov plans to use the dividend he’ll receive from his 79 percent holding to cut debt related to other businesses, he said in July.

The rest of the proceeds from the U.S. assets sale will be used to cut the company’s debt, which will allow Severstal to implement a new dividend policy of paying half of its profits to investors.

Norilsk’s board is scheduled to approve $2.78 billion of interim dividends, almost triple the amount expected. Potanin, the chief executive officer and owner of about 30 percent of Norilsk, said last week the company may distribute any cash exceeding $1 billion from its balance sheet to shareholders.

Capital Controls

He was one of the businessmen with whom Prokhorov talked unofficially over the Uralkali deal and who rejected the idea of a purchase, the people said.

The dividend from Norilsk will help billionaire Oleg Deripaska’s United Co. Rusal, which has $10 billion of debt and owns about 28 percent of the nickel company. Potanin himself may also use some of the proceeds to cut personal borrowings, Deutsche Bank AG analyst George Buzhenitsa said.

The risks of Russia imposing capital controls, preventing free conversion of currencies and the arrest of AFK Sistema (SSA) owner Vladimir Evtushenkov may also encourage other businessmen to distribute more profits and cut debts when possible, Bushueva said.

sanctions, Russia

Read more

Oil Market Report - March 2020

Crude oil prices ended February 2020 sharply lower with both ICE Brent and NYMEXWTI showing monthly declines of more than 12% to reach their lowest monthlyvalues in almost 2.5 years as the rapid spread of Covid-19 in China and several othercountries raised investors’ concerns about the impacts on the global economy and oildemand, and triggered a sharp sell-off in markets amid uncertainties on the extent ofdemand destruction and worries that this health crisis might evolve into a pandemic.

oil, investment, equity

Arbat Capital: Banking Sector Report - February 2020

US banks tumbled again in February after very weak performance in January amid spreading COVID-19 around the world. The broad market was underperformed substantially for the second consecutive month after 4 months in a row of leading dynamics. Thus, BKX index decreased by 12.5% MoM in February vs -8.4% MoM of SPX index. Absolute performance on MoM basis was -2 std from the mean and it is in the bottom 4% of absolute MoM performance of BKX index.

investment, banks;

Commodity market Report - February 2020

Trade war is officially over but Chinese risks resurfaced from the other side - extreme quarantine measures after coronavirus outbreak in Jan-Feb resulted in significant breakdown in the industrial production chains and construction activity. However monetary and fiscal stimuli quickly reversed negative sentiment and overall risk conditions returned to the high Greed mode with only commodities market kept in risk-off mode. Energy complex was very volatile as its initial sharp drop was lately compensated by OPEC verbal interventions and renewed risk in Libya and Venezuela. Industrial metals fell sharply, but Precious shined brightly with unbelievable bubble in Palladium. Agri commodities were mostly range bound with Cocoa being top performer

Macroeconomic drivers turn to negative as positive developments after the Trade Deal signature and record financial markets levels gave the way to fears of world economic slowdown after the virus outbreak. On the other hand there were not many voices for recession as stimulative monetary policy should provide the cushion. However we think that markets overstated willingness of the Fed to keep on printing and the main risk once again turned to the hawkish surprise when it exits REPO stimulus gambit and the ECB to end QE.