HomeResearch and NewsRussia May Drop the Plan for Gazprom
Comment

Russia May Drop the Plan for Gazprom

OAO Gazprom, the world’s largest natural-gas producer, may pay a lower dividend in 2016 than Russia earlier predicted as investments in export pipelines soar, according to materials for a government meeting last week.

The Finance Ministry expects to get 84.4 billion rubles ($2.5 billion) from Gazprom dividends in 2016, 32 percent less than an earlier forecast of 124.7 billion rubles, according to the document obtained by Bloomberg News. The new figure equates to 9.3 rubles a share, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

The government’s lower forecast for dividends may reflect investment plans at state-controlled Gazprom. The Moscow-based company decided in May to spend $55 billion in the next decade to build a gas pipeline to China and develop east Siberian fields. It must also finance the $22 billion South Stream pipeline project to the European Union.

The state plans on getting 68.8 billion rubles from its share in Gazprom in 2015, unchanged from an earlier forecast, Russia’s Finance Ministry said in the document. That equates to a 5 percentincrease from this year and equals about 7.6 rubles a share, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Payments to the budget in 2017 are estimated at 92.9 billion rubles, the minisry said, equal to 10.2 rubles a share.

Russian Standards

The ministry used profits estimated under Russian accounting standards when calculating some of the state companies’ dividends, a government official said, asking not to be identified because the information isn’t public. The payout percentage was also reduced, with almost all of the calculations based on payments of 25 percent of profit under Russian standards, he said.

Gazprom shares rose 0.8 percent to close at 150.31 rubles in Moscow today. State-controlled companies were due to pay at least 35 percent of profit under international accounting standards from 2016 to boost payments to the budget, the Finance Ministry said last year. Russia’s Economy Ministry opposed the measure in May.

Russia may drop the plan for Gazprom, said Yulia Bushueva, a managing director at Arbat Capital in Moscow. If there’s a need to boost budget income, the government may introduce new taxes rather than sharing more profit with Gazprom’s minority shareholders, she said.

Gazprom has 23.7 billion shares outstanding and 38.4 percent is owned directly by the government. The company’s profit to Russian standards was 628 billion rubles last year versus to 1.139 trillion rubles to international standards.

Gazprom spokesman Igor Volobuev declined to comment, saying that questions on state forecasts should be directed to the Finance Ministry. Finance Ministry spokeswoman Svetlana Nikitina didn’t immediately return a request for comment.

Russia, Gazprom

Read more

Oil Market Report - March 2020

Crude oil prices ended February 2020 sharply lower with both ICE Brent and NYMEXWTI showing monthly declines of more than 12% to reach their lowest monthlyvalues in almost 2.5 years as the rapid spread of Covid-19 in China and several othercountries raised investors’ concerns about the impacts on the global economy and oildemand, and triggered a sharp sell-off in markets amid uncertainties on the extent ofdemand destruction and worries that this health crisis might evolve into a pandemic.

oil, investment, equity

Arbat Capital: Banking Sector Report - February 2020

US banks tumbled again in February after very weak performance in January amid spreading COVID-19 around the world. The broad market was underperformed substantially for the second consecutive month after 4 months in a row of leading dynamics. Thus, BKX index decreased by 12.5% MoM in February vs -8.4% MoM of SPX index. Absolute performance on MoM basis was -2 std from the mean and it is in the bottom 4% of absolute MoM performance of BKX index.

investment, banks;

Commodity market Report - February 2020

Trade war is officially over but Chinese risks resurfaced from the other side - extreme quarantine measures after coronavirus outbreak in Jan-Feb resulted in significant breakdown in the industrial production chains and construction activity. However monetary and fiscal stimuli quickly reversed negative sentiment and overall risk conditions returned to the high Greed mode with only commodities market kept in risk-off mode. Energy complex was very volatile as its initial sharp drop was lately compensated by OPEC verbal interventions and renewed risk in Libya and Venezuela. Industrial metals fell sharply, but Precious shined brightly with unbelievable bubble in Palladium. Agri commodities were mostly range bound with Cocoa being top performer

Macroeconomic drivers turn to negative as positive developments after the Trade Deal signature and record financial markets levels gave the way to fears of world economic slowdown after the virus outbreak. On the other hand there were not many voices for recession as stimulative monetary policy should provide the cushion. However we think that markets overstated willingness of the Fed to keep on printing and the main risk once again turned to the hawkish surprise when it exits REPO stimulus gambit and the ECB to end QE. 

commodity;